Comfortable with Discomfort: Conversations on Race

Earliest posts at the bottom

Whiteness Part 4

July 28, 2020

Now, you may be wondering what this all has to do with education. Programs like Teach for America have been criticized for their status as mostly white groups going in to urban communities as “saviors.” People I love have participated in this programmed, and I know they have done good work and have good intentions, so I cannot say I support this summation of TFA and similar institutions. I am not here to evaluate their efficacy or even intent. I simply note the lack of popularity for similar programs addressing poor whites.

In order to understand this, I examined myself. My efforts to promote equity in education have been city-centric, specifically the city in which I myself was educated and have lived my whole life. I have resources and connections here that enable me to do effective work. It had never occurred to me to focus elsewhere until briefly whilst reading Hillbilly Elegy and then again now, more soberingly, amidst overwhelming polarization and misinformation and grappling with my own whiteness.

I have been called white trash before. I have even called myself that. In a way, this was to make a joke about myself before anyone else could. This never felt good nor just, but I interpreted those feelings of discomfort as an inevitable cost of being white in a society where whiteness is a privilege. Now that I’ve learned so much more about the complicated dynamics of race, gender, class and more in society, I understand the the necessity of educating all on all sorts of inequalities. The dominant narratives currently implement specific identities to forge social groups, thereby emphasizing our differences. In so doing, we define ourselves and others as distinct. In failing to acknowledge our interdependence, the benefits of one group seem irrelevant to the other. Efforts on behalf of the group in power to promote equality necessarily become acts of charity, and if there is one thing I’ve learned about humans, it is this: we cannot rely on charity alone.

I do not believe this is human nature. In fact, I believe “humanity” defines humans. However, our culture promotes competition, so we perceive others’ successes as threats to our own. Of course people fail to empathize with out-group members. I truly believe the social change we desire begins with emphasizing our identities as humans above all others.

I also believe it requires acknowledgiing everyone’s personal narratives and plights, which is a very difficult thing to do when an entire swath of people have their lives threatened daily. God damn, that’s hard. But it is necessary because in addition to a society that breeds self-centered independence, we humans have relatively primitive brains when it comes to empathy. Statistics don’t work to hook readers into caring; stories do. It’s easy to wave a hand at a mass of faceless people, but nearly impossible to do this to someone looking directly into your eyes. In order to address larger systemic and historical issues, we must start with individual empathy.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Whiteness Part 3

July 28, 2020

White boys love rap. Or at least, they say or think or demonstrate they do. White fuels are beginning to wear hoops and acrylics. Appropriation isn’t new, and I’m not quite sure it’s inherently bad. America is built on exploitation of people of color in every way: economically, socially, politically, culturally. While a burden on those for whom the label is not optional, “blackness” is cool for those selectively extracting from it. More simply, white people (particularly white youth) appropriate aspects of black culture as “pop” culture” as a way to signal their own culture and/or coolness. For example, during the jazz era, wealthy white youth “slummed” in Harlem neighborhoods on the weekends to listen to black musicians. Again, I cannot claim whether this is universally good nor bad; I can just claim it has been and it is.

I wonder the origin of this. Some scholars posit white people, on a deep level, feel inherently inferior to black people, and so absorb aspects of their culture without attribution as a means of feeding their own egos. Stereotypes of black people, such as the black man as hyper-masculine or the black woman as hyper-sexual, can be appropriated by white people to emphasize those characteristics (which otherwise seem to be absent) within themselves. Black author and musician Greg Tate comments that, when it comes to black culture, white Americans seem ravenous for “everything but the burden.”

I see truth in this. I also see truth in a coexistent phenomena: ‘white guilt’, which Wikipedia defines as “individual or collective guilt felt by some white people for harm resulting from racist treatment of ethnic minorities such as African Americans and indigenous peoples by other white people, most specifically in the context of the Atlantic slave trade, European colonialism and the legacy of these eras.”  This operational definition explains downstream phenomena such as Benevolent Racism, or the act of responding to one’s own racism with extreme politeness or superficial positivity towards the oppressed group while still ‘othering’ them, thereby failing to confront one’s own racism. White Christian missionary work finds its roots here, as did American slave-holder justifications for slavery that involved the inherent ‘darkness’ of black souls and ‘lightness’ of whites, who must enslave blacks in order to redeem them in heaven.    

Those unfamiliar with racism and anti-racism conversations may read this and wonder, “What’s wrong with benevolence”? Uncontextualized, nothing. In practice, however, superficial benevolence vacuums empathy from an interaction.  Perpetrators or perpetuators of racism need not engage in actually investigating or abolishing their racism if they use this salve. They fail to see the depths of racism and their complicity in racist structures. Benevolence is safe because it is impersonal, and if it is impersonal, it’s missing the point.  Racism is personal for everyone, always, at all points.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Whiteness Part 2

July 28, 2020

When I think of how to “help the world”, I think of educating children, and to be honest, when I think of educating children, I do not think of American children, so I already feeling shaky broaching this subject. For example, when I think of gender equality in, say, the Middle East, I do not imagine schools for just girls but also the boys who otherwise would grow into men that perpetuate the systems we must dismantle. No vision of a more humane world involves focusing on a singular slice of the population, no matter how much I love them.

As of 2018, 60% of America’s population is non-Hispanic white, and 41% of people below poverty are white. While that’s disproportionate, that’s still a lot: ~16 million people we’re talking. Beyond just the fact that poor white Americans are humans  struggling and could use help and attention, they also are necessary for promoting the social, economic and political equality of people of color in America. Simply focusing on the latter populations burdens these very communities with the revolution. The impetus is on them to be stronger, smarter, resilient. That’s unjust.

While we strengthen communities of color, we must also rehabilitate white Americans. This does not mean teaching them of their privilege. This means acknowledging their pain. I know first hand how indigestible lectures of white privilege can be for a white person who’s struggled greatly. I’m grateful my instinct was to shut up and try to understand, but I don’t suspect that’s universally common or even correct.

And yet—

I don’t see too many of my benevolent white peers focusing on poor whites. I know of very few rural outreach programs (for the record: 78% of America’s rural population is white, whereas on average 35% of America’s urban population is white.) And I wonder why.

Firstly, I think it comes across as an “All Lives Matter” effort that may threaten to deter from the BLM movement. Secondly, I think the benevolent white people, like me, are afraid.

I am afraid to seem like an All Lives Matter person, even wondering about educating poor white children, yes, but there are deeper fears and wonderings within me. I didn’t even register at the time that my white peers who left college to teach ended up exclusively in urban schools. Deep in my unconscious, equity in education started in communities of color. Now, I believe unshakably equity begins everywhere. I can’t help it! Therefore, one of the things I wonder is why my first ideas (and those of many others) of equity in education do or did not expand to white children in poor areas. I wonder if this is reflected in the images of social upheaval we now see.

I see ignorance and subsequent miscommunication as causes, and I struggle to determine when to hold someone accountable for their ignorance. I’ve come to use Maya Angelou’s rule of thumb: “if you know better, do better.” People’s ignorance is not their fault. When encountered with illumination one reacts aggressively or rejects the opportunity to learn, then I see that as a hubristic reflex for which the actor is responsible. However, this is assuming the edifier also acted gracefully, which is not always the case. People in the position to educate must also be open to being wrong in either their ideals or their execution. Grace and wisdom are refractions of one another.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Whiteness Part 1

July 28, 2020

Cities have people. A lot of them. Super close to one another. They also have a lot of coffee, which I’m sure contributes to the frenetic energy. Cities have historically been diverse places with respect to class, which means an educated and/or wealthy elite coexists in awful living conditions of underprivileged communities.  All this to say, it’s very easy for a wealthy-ish benevolent white person to see communities of color getting FUCKED.

The reason I’m saying all this is because I’m “curious” (a word which I suspect is beginning to mean “afraid to admit guilty”) about poor white children. I was a poor white child in an inner-city and was able to benefit from some of the programs from the benevolent white people: free breakfast, free books, suburban “pen pals”. I also saw how necessary these programs were.

Now, when I imagine an “uneducated voter”, I imagine a “poor white”, of which I could have been if not for the programs and resources for “urban children” I benefited from that weren’t really for me in the first place. I think of Incels and Neo-Nazis and Florida. I must be honest here; if not, I’m part of the problem. In that vein, I cannot imagine a solution  that ignores kindness towards the children of these communities.

White people make me uncomfortable for all kinds of reasons. I’m definitely in my comfortable zone in urban settings and certainly so aiding children from these communities. I’m uncomfortable, though, imagining volunteering in a rural community. If I said it’s because they scare me, I’d be lying.  Or, at least, misleading.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Get Comfortable with Discomfort

July 15, 2020

I love you, human. I don’t even need to know who you are to know that I do. If you feel otherwise, then perhaps you and I have different parameters for ‘love’.

Yesterday I was having a conversation about pitbulls. That morning, I had listened to interviews with mothers of boys slain by police: Mamie Elizabeth Till-Mobley, Samaria Rice, Sybrina Fulton and more. I was walking past a yoga studio, and I got angry. I was angry at myself.

You see, I feel most alive engaged in the struggle for racial equality. It doesn’t feel good; it feels real. The word “resonant” may ring more accurately. And yet, I spend many days absorbed in other things. Teaching yoga in that studio, for example, calling out botched Sanskrit, playing Hindu songs, appealing to watered-down Buddhists for other white people who were using an Eastern religion to get their cardio in for the day. Of course, I was one of them, and of course, I tried to understand to the best of my capability the history of what I was teaching and playing, but of course, I am human. By definition, I am ignorant.

Other times, I’m teaching wealthy people things that I had to teach myself: math, writing, empathy. I tell myself that every heart I touch makes this world a better place, but it’s hard to keep believing that when I go back home to Bridgeport and see just how much justice there is to be redeemed.

I’m still not sure how best to help the world. I am sure, though, that the solution lies not in what caused the problem. In other words, the revolution will not be comfortable. Social norms and status quo must be broken, and that is by its very nature uncomfortable.

“Pitbulls simply are just violent dogs. They’re bred to be that way.” I couldn’t help but hear antebellum eugenicist rhetoric deep below these comments. I don’t believe anyone in the conversation consciously intended so. All I can say is this: there seems to be a lot of overlap between stereotypes of pitbulls and those of black Americans: violent, irredeemable, should be caged.

Part of me put water on these thoughts: that’s a fire that doesn’t need to be fanned right now. What’s more, no one was trying to have a conversation about race. We were just trying to have a conversation, to keep the empty space filled with commentary on safe aspects of reality, to be comfortable. Besides, the conversation would move quickly into another topic. Nothing needed to be done.

Every moment when that decision is made— to decide against mentioning racial implications of a conversation or action— reinforces the status quo. It perpetuates the comfort zone of white people who can navigate society racelessly. For Americans of color, though, racial implications are unavoidable. To be in an all white space and to completely avoid the racial dimensions of a conversation is to essentially reconstruct reality, effectively destroying it. The conversation’s narrow scope appears complete and conclusive.

I’m ashamed remembering the times when racial undertones of a conversation screamed out at me, but I said nothing. I’m also ashamed that I’m unable to remember certain moments when this was the case because I failed to notice them myself. I prioritized keeping others comfortable, convinced mentioning race would do more harm than good in terms of understanding. However, it’s precisely because these topics are so emotionally fraught that they must be discussed in more casual settings. Confronting racism must be normalized. It is pervasive because it is normal. It is baked in to American’s daily lives. Thus, relegating it to the occasional forum or bedside book misses the point and the mark.

Confronting racism doesn’t mean confrontation. It starts with a question: “What kind of person do you imagine owning a pitbull?” or “What does ‘urban’ mean to you?”. It starts with a presumption of humanity and love. It starts with a humility that your perspective is the one that’s limited. It starts with a longing to learn, not to teach.

That is how I love you. Whoever you are, I come to you from you. I know you have humanity within you, and love, and pain, and wonder. If I can’t see it, I need to look harder. You must do the same. We all must, and it will be uncomfortable, but the only way to a better world involves growing pains.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

The Nature of Perception: Schemas

July 8, 2020

A woman has been hypnotized. She is on the ground, barking like a dog, in front of an audience of hundreds. The hypnotist snaps, she comes to, and the hypnotist asks, “Why were you on the floor?” The woman, without missing a beat, replies, “Oh, I was looking for my contact.”

People will reactively reject or explain away anything that doesn’t fit into their existent schema. For example, if someone doesn’t believe in ghosts and late one eve, they see a flash of white out of the corner of their eye, they’ll reason, “Oh, that must have been the cat.” It would take a lot of flashes and a whole lot of terror to change this person’s gut exclamation to, “Casper?!” People will even reject foreign knowledge or systems that benefit them. It’s like Stockholm syndrome but for ideas. Someone with an extremely high self-concept will not register evidence of their self-centeredness. If someone highlights it, they’ll rationalize: “Oh, you’re just jealous.”

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Personal Experience with Race 3/3: College: But I'm not the ones you're talking about...

June 30, 2020

Trayvon Martin got murdered when I was in high school. The Diversity Club at Hopkins hosted a not-as-poorly-attended-as-usual meeting in a bio classroom where they showed a powerpoint about police brutality. After those 26 children at Sandy Hook were massacred, the school hosted a day of conversation.

Police brutality didn’t rise to the forefront of social and political conversation until I was in college, when Michael Brown was killed. My college became an epicenter for racial demonstrations and education. I witnessed my peers bravely face administrators and demand humanity. Countless cultural groups, that had been fighting for a voice for years but never given a mic until then, stepped up and set up demonstration after demonstration until actionable change happened.

I attended protests and teach-ins. I read and read and read. I changed my course-load to reflect my crystallizing passion for racial equity. I felt it personally, viscerally. The rhythms of the movement mirrored the rhythm I was raised it, and some part of me that had been dormant re-awokened.

As did intense anger. At first, the source of was unclear, and so it manifested as defensiveness. I wasn’t one of “those” white people. I grew up listening to patois and “ayo, gringa!”’s. I couldn’t go to all the protests because I couldn’t skip work because I needed to stay in school because I had nothing else. Since I was eighteen, I had no financial support besides myself: my mom had stolen thousands of dollars from me and ghosted my financial aid applications and payments. I had four on-campus jobs to pay my tuition and living costs. My grandma had died, my aunt overdosed, my dad got hospitalized, my brother was suicidal, and so was I. I watched my peers of color find inspiration and life during the demonstrations, and I envied their ability to assert their power in public. I wanted to wear my struggle and demand respect in a megaphone. I wanted to dance and rejoice in my resilience. Most of all, I wanted community. I had a chip on my shoulder: Shit’s hard out here for me, too, and I don’t even have a community or music or movement in which I can find solidarity. I’m struggling, too, but I’m alone.

What I resented most , however, was the fact that some of my peers who were demonstrating also had to work to keep themselves in school. They also bore the weight of their own future and a nation’s history. Their families’ livelihood also balanced on the investment in this education. But they went out anyway because they couldn’t not. Although financially similar, I could afford to choose my progress over the movement’s. What I thought was anger and resentment was actually the familiar shame of my whiteness. The inventory of adversity I was keeping was just to protect me and justify my self-oriented lifestyle.

I abandoned my foundational friends. I chose my whiteness and the privileges it allotted me above my friends that had shaped me, taught me, listened to me, loved me. They were two babies or jail sentences deep, and I hadn’t talk to them since I learned how to code switch to academia and cashed in my whiteness. I was fake. I was a flake. I was white.

I now hold more empathy for my younger self now. I see clearly the dichotomy I created (between advocating for the liberation of others versus my own) is false. Also, having lived through more years and experienced more people, I’ve learned this polarized thinking isn’t unique to me or white people. Years of studying psychology has taught me this: we’re more alike than we are different. Black or white, we grew up in a culture that values and thus rewards individualism and independence. We learn “success” means to “get ours”. This leaves feeling many of us— especially without solid home lives— feeling valueless, lonely, unseen. We need to work to prove our worthiness, but society gobbles up our time without giving us just enough to sustain us to the next day, when we can do it all again.

Thus, there seems to be no time to “work” for someone else. This is the problem, though, of deep unhealthy psychology such as hyper-individualism or depression. The “cures” require exactly that which the diseases prevent. People struggling with depression need to get up, eat, exercise, socialize, do acts of service, shower; depression, though, renders them nearly catatonic, lethargic, without appetite, anti-social, self-oriented. Individualism is a lie that must be countered with community and time and space and honesty; it devours community, time, space, and honesty and promotes isolation, efficiency, and self-aggrandizement.

I am not free while any woman is unfree,” activist and author Audre Lorde declared. This first half of the sentence is more often quoted than the second: “Even when her shackles are very different from my own.” We must reconfigure the entire system. Regardless of the demographics of the oppressed, oppression will continue as long as a hierarchical system scaffolded on historical inequality persists. Throughout the era of modern nation-states they teach us in school, we’ve been playing, as a globe, King of the Hill. At any moment, we can be the one on top, and you can just as quickly become again the one on the bottom. We can never be confident in our position while the game persists unless we do one of two things: 1. Resign ourselves to the bottom rank, out of which no one will try to knock us, or 2. STOP THE GAME ALTOGETHER.

We have stakes in any conversation for freedom, for equality, for ourselves or our peers. The fight is for humanity, and we all benefit from acting more humanely.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Early Experience with Race 2/3: Amongst the whites.

June 30, 2020

Occasionally, I’d occupy white spaces. My church, for example, had more white people than I was used to. I attended a couple summer camps. My dad refereed basketball games at schools in the suburbs. I never felt more out of place than in these environments. I had the same skin as these girls, but just like I didn’t have the newest Jordans, I didn’t even understand why someone would want Uggs. If I tried to speak to them, they’d find ways to walk away or change the subject. They called me ‘weird’ and wouldn’t talk to me. They thought I was gross for loving McDonalds and not owning an eye-lash curler. Unlike my peers of color, who judged my whiteness, the white girls my age judged me. I resented these white people, who were allowed to live in the privileges of whiteness without abandon. I felt like they didn’t get, and I also didn’t get it, but I was reminded every day that I didn’t get it, and they just got to not get it and also get everything they wanted. These feelings strengthened my solidarity with people of color. 

In the same vein, when a friend of color stayed over my house and commented that shit there was crazy, I felt weirdly vindicated. I was definitely embarrassed while the ‘crazy shit’ was going down, but ultimately I liked my friends acknowledging my difficulties. Finally, I felt like I was seen beyond my whiteness. A human-connection. A taste of community. 

When I started private high school as a scholarship kid and the only student from Bridgeport, my racial identity was even more muddied. I looked like my peers, but I didn’t dress like them, or talk like them, or know what the fuck they were talking about 95% of the time. Their conversations were boring, about thigh gaps or Ke$ha songs. Where were the spontaneous free style sessions? Fights? Hilarious aunts and the never ending co-ed Wall Ball games? 

The school was doubly segregated, by gender and race. Girls didn’t eat the lunch food. They complained about it. They dumped full plates of food and went back for basic cereal. I was in heaven, and didn’t mind asking for or eating their left overs. Girls just sat around trying to be noticed by the guys who were playing lacrosse trying to be noticed by the girls. Boys sat around waiting for someone to do something to make bad jokes about. The students of colors all sat at one table, and I wanted to sit with them so bad. They were talking and laughing and living how I was used to, but they were all from New Haven outreach programs and already knew each other. What’s more, the school was so obliviously white that students of color needed to create their own safe space. Their discomfort amongst our white peers was unfathomable compared to mine.

As I had learned to do, I dove into my education inside and outside of class. I got lost in art and what I loved. I hung out with whoever I ended up around and made the most of it. I struggled to keep up with my peers, since I had an unstable home life, a longer commute, fewer resources, and no money, and also no awareness that this was the case. I didn’t realize how different my peers’ home circumstances were. I understood my struggle to be a fault of my incompetence and not a consequence of class chasms.

Race and class discomforts became less dominant narratives as my identity as a perpetual outsider developed. I felt “other” because I, as an individual, was defective. The world was doing me such a favor letting me stay here, and all I could do to show my gratitude was continue to live with as much earnest love and passion as possible.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Early Experiences with Race 1/3: I hate my whiteness.

June 28, 2020

My first understanding of whiteness was: ew.

White people were annoying, unattractive, untalented, oblivious, bland. In Bridgeport, CT, as a rare white girl amongst mostly people of color, I hated my whiteness.

I could have embraced white culture, gone to Goodwill and bought some Abercrombie, chewed on bubble gum instead of Now and Laters, but I’d get ripped a new one, Wayne Brothers Style. If I went in the opposite way and started to roll my r’s and gel back my greasy bun, I’d get reamed for being a poser, an “uh-oh oreo”.

The last thing I wanted was to get called out for trying too hard. To me, nothing was more painful than publicly attempting something, bearing your heart and soul, and being laughed at. So I just embraced being the quiet and polite white elephant in the room.

What my peers and I all understood, albeit unconsciously at the time, was that ultimately, white people had the power. When an old white man on my block told the black family that just moved in to go back to Africa, no one was surprised. In a sense, we kids were all jaded. We didn’t expect the presidents in our text books to be anything other than white men. We didn’t waste our breath questioning why most of our teachers were white or wondering where they lived. If we had any special guest speakers come in to talk to our school, they better bring food or else we’d demolish their confidence. We had this one substitute teacher who died her hair blonde one night and the next day, we called her “Sunshine” until she cried. Classical musicians would come perform for some sort of enrichment program, and all I remember is making fun of the way they jerked around when the music overtook them. Police were lazy, corrupt, racist—useless.

In accordance, I was bullied for my race, usually “playfully” but sometimes seriously. Strangers have approached me on my street and told me to go back to where I come from. More than once, friends have unprompted punched me straight in the face. I couldn’t complain, though. I didn’t want to be seen as the weak, annoying, or uncool white girl, so I didn’t complain, and quite honestly, if it happened now, I wouldn’t either.

Despite all this, my friendships were pure. I’ll never forget Amony Stancil standing up for me when a group of boys laughed at the baby food I had brought for lunch: “Shut up ‘cause you know it taste good!” Or staying up all night with Danaisha Wheeler talking about life, crying, laughing, and being perfectly prepubescent. Or Peggy Colas spending hours giving me corn rows and making me feel less lame about my bright red scalp and teary eyes.

With phenomenal gratitude, I remember my friends growing up. Their capacity for love and laughter astounds me. Even though I lived in the same neighborhood, attended the same schools, and drank the same water as my peers of color, the life-altering difference between us was obvious. Of course I was annoying: my skin was screaming.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

What is this? START HERE.

June 27, 2020

This is for people who are white and want to do the right thing on a societal level but who need guidance digesting on the personal level.

Hello. I am a person and my skin is white. My whiteness has both benefitted and hurt me. Life has brought me success and struggle. It’s easy to remember the latter and see how my difficulties have directly affected my trajectory. I admit, therefore, that at first, I had some difficulty digesting the word “privilege”.

Overall, I have organized the parts of me that this word and its ideas have upturned. I am in a healthy, peaceful place. But it has not been easy, it is not easy, and it will not be always easy. But it can get easier.

Making it easier— and making sense— is why I write this. I hope that is why you read this. Let’s figure that out, if you haven’t already:

  1. Are you a person who is white?

  2. Have you tried your best to live morally and do what’s right?

  3. Have you felt deep pain and/or faced deep struggles?

  4. Do you have people you love?

  5. Are you interested in racial justice?

  6. Do you attempt to learn and listen more about racism in America and feel it’s something we must address?

  7. As you learn and listen, does some part of you still have questions you are afraid to ask ? Or parts of the rhetoric that don’t sit right with you?

If you are a ‘yes’ to most or all of these, then I am writing for you. If not, then you can stay with us if you’d like. You are included amongst we humans, though you may not be able to directly relate to all the topics discussed.

Things you may feel that you’re afraid or embarassed to admit:

  1. How do I have ‘white privilege’ when such shitty things have happened to me?

  2. I know people who are black that seem way more privileged than me.

  3. I feel defensive when my ‘white privilege’ or ‘fragility’ is mentioned.

  4. I hate being grouped in with ‘white people’.

  5. Sometimes, I feel attacked.

  6. I feel I need to hate myself for being white, and that feels unfair and wrong.

  7. Violence makes me uncomfortable.

  8. I’m terrified to say the wrong thing.

  9. How do I be an ‘ally’ without being a ‘white savior’? Is being an ‘ally’ even a good thing anymore?

  10. I do feel guilty for being white.

  11. Sometimes I do feel racism towards white people, and that upsets me.

  12. I feel like I’m only allowed to be ‘white’ and not a full person.

If you’ve engaged in the movement at all, you’ve certainly heard activists imploring white people to educate themselves. It is necessary to learn about history, policy, society, and everything in between, and there are so many amazing resources besides this to do such. This is to help process it all.

COVID19-2020

You know how house cats can start eating plastic bags? Because of some nutrient deficiency or domestication-bred OCD? I know I’m eating plastic, but I don’t know where to get soul food around here.

My mom always commends my grandma for “breaking the cycle of abuse.” This got under my skin for a while. They overlooked the violence I experienced daily at the hand of my mother. I know my mother is referring to sexual abuse, but by doing so evidences she’s not yet ready to look at herself. Now, envisioning my grandma “breaking the cycle”, I see a refraction of my mother’s statement that rings true: my grandma didn’t break the cycle as in one breaks a microwave or car but rather as in breaking ground. She began the process of digging, then building.

So, at first, I thought these were growing pains, and I attributed it to these intergenerational wounds. But recently I’ve begun questioning the origins of my depression and anxiety. Am I simply swimming in the wake of the past, or am I wading in the surge of a new oncoming wave?

I was thinking about history, and how we tell it: as a string of events and people, and really only a certain kind of people, written by those same people. A collection of “facts” that on the surface aims to explain how we got here but effectively justifies the natural way of things. All our brains need is a few concrete “facts” between which they can spin a narrative, like clues at a crime scene. We’re good at confabulation; we have to be. Seeing what’s not there is our main survival tool, our not-so-secret weapon.

But our stories are vacuum sealed, sucking out all the thickness of daily living. How can we transcribe a time’s ambient anxiety? How to convey chaos? We project this order onto the past because we can see the causal sequences. This interpretation can’t begin until we’re out of the daily uncertainty. It’s like, I couldn’t flesh out my traumas until I was in a safe place away from it all spatially and temporarily. From here, it all seems so obvious and basic and sometimes silly.

I say this to reassure myself the time I live in isn’t more or less crazy than any other. But then I think about house cats eating god damn plastic, and I remember myself. I am of a godless generation. My ancestors coevolved with community and religions. Their brains and behaviors that led towards god also led them to survive and dot-dot-dot-make me. They wired around and so I’m wired for god. That doesn’t mean I have an empty god-shaped slot in my brain. It just means I have needs that aren’t being met. Religion provides community, ritual, witness, humility, order, accountability, a space to be vulnerable, blessings, a connection to humanity and nature. During this tumult, I find myself reaching for these things, trying to reverse engineer in a lifetime what took tens of thousands of years of evolution. It’s naive and futile, but all I have is plastic bags.

Positively Evolution

I wouldn’t be here today if it weren’t for my ancient ancestors who, thousands of years ago, relieving themselves in the bush, felt a pleasant tingle in their sphincters.

When you read “natural selection”, what traits do you think of? Tall necks allowing giraffes to reach leaves high on acacia trees? Sharp teeth of a lion sinking in to the flesh of a gazelle? Dodo birds being too dumb to make it in the harsh trappings of modernity? Most depictions involve some sort of tragic demise or genetic triumph. Humans highlight clever cognitive abilities such as memory or deduction to explain our primacy on the food chain. We can make tools, kill off competition, create culture to pass down knowledge of which berries to eat and snakes to avoid. Our evolution revolves around avoiding death, and rarely do we talk about promoting pleasure. 

That’s no surprise, really. Humans tend to focus on the negative. We’re wired that way. There’s no time to stop and smell the flowers if a saber tooth tiger has clamped its chompers down on your thigh. But in the modern world, where threats are often distal or abstract, this mechanism can be a detriment to psychological health and overall survival. Focusing on the positives may not be our first instinct, but it promotes survival just as much, if not more, as our negative and narrow attention. In that vein, I wonder: what positive traits were “selected for” in human lineage? What scrumptious and joyous affinities enabled our survival? What pleasures define the line from Cro-Magnon to me?

The euphoric release of a shit, for starters. A fondness of fires and family. An awe of nature. These aren’t just added bonuses evolution threw in there on our path to the present. These are survival tactics on par with sharp teeth and good vision. Think of all the smooth-tongued bipeds who couldn’t taste the strawberry’s sweetness! Who couldn’t feel the bliss of being on the same page as someone else! Who couldn’t laugh until it hurt! 

Next time you feel something good, acknowledge it’s function and power. Your ancestors passed that onto you, and it made you able to survive and thrive. 

Question and Manswer

An Op-Ed Originally Published in the Yale Daily News on January 31, 2017: https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2017/01/31/speer-question-and-manswer/

 

A T.A. (male) gave a guest lecture to my formal logic class. At one point, my professor (female) raised her hand to ask the T.A. a question. It was clear she was trying to take the conversation to the next conceptual level. The T.A. earnestly responded with some canned explanation of a fundamental aspect of logic that she had in fact taught us the first week of class. In other words, he answered a question she did not ask. He presumed, whether consciously or not, that she must be asking about something he had already said, that she needed clarification, that she was asking for something that he could provide, that there was no world in which she could be going beyond what he had covered or — god forbid — beyond his realm of knowledge.

There is a power dynamic inherent to asking a question: The questioner places the respondent in a position of authority — but only if the latter is able to answer. In turn, the respondent can either assume a higher status, a status equal to the questioner — by conceding that he (it’s often he) doesn’t know — or (impossible but juicy) assume a lower status.

Let’s take a moment to think of what this final option might look like. “That’s a good question.” Or a “Huh — I’ve never thought of that before.” Or even a “You know what? I was going to b.s. an answer to maintain an illusion of omniscience, but I’ve decided to be honest and admit I don’t know.” Yum.

Here is that distilled in logical paraphrase:

P= Woman asks man a question

A= Man answers with (a), where in (a) he assumes a higher status

B= Man answers with (b), where in (b) he assumes an equal status

C= Man answers with (c), where in (c) he assumes a lower status

Now here is the story of my life: P =⊃A^infinity.

Feminist essayist Rebecca Solnit, the oft-cited inventress of the concept of “mansplaining”, states that the phenomenon results from “overconfidence and cluelessness”. Manswering is a specific manifestation of mansplaining. It happens when a man (consciously or not) automatically assumes a position of higher status when answering a question, in order to protect his ego or maintain at least an illusion of authority. In turn, a woman is automatically demoted to a lower status: “Ha! Silly girl! What a sweet innocent vessel beginning for me to fill it with my fat knowledge.” Alternatively: “I’m a busy, busy man, but I guess I can spare you a few seconds of my precious time to b.s. like you’ve never seen before.”

These are conversational political pivots, just that they aren’t political — simply patronizing. Too often, I have asked a man a question, only to have him indulge in verbal masturbation. By the time he finishes, I invariably end up throwing out my question entirely.

Don’t dismiss me as just another woman nagging out of her furious vulva. Listen: I love males. My dad is a male. I have a brother who is a male. The males, I love them. I am merely suggesting a way to optimize human interaction. At this point, you may not be convinced. The preservation of women’s sense of personhood may not motivate you to address manswering. I get it: pathos is for pussies, and ethos is useless because I have a pussy. So even though I am just a woman, I figured I would try my hand at logos: Imagine how much more efficient conversations would be if women (read: people) didn’t have to ask every question twice!

To the manswerers of the world: I hereby relieve you of the heavy burden of patronizing and pathologizing women. I free you to live among females who actually actively listen and who can become just as interested in an abstract topic as you are. You may find yourself saying “I don’t know” or “good question” more often and speaking less, but that’s okay. We will know you’re listening. 

Intellectuals: Ahistory: Thrival of the Most Loved

We like to think we’re big smart smart. We’re no cavemen. We like to think time is linear because we’re actually brutish, and it takes a higher order of thinking to conceptualize of the more abstract, cyclical truth of reality. We need a face to blame. We need something to hate. We need a goal to pursue. We need literal symbols of our deeper, subconscious movements.

There’s also stratification within our literal classifications. Our associations usually fall to the lowest energy level, our primal nature. Think of cultural “truisms” like war and violence, “dog eat dog”, “survival of the fittest”. Do I think this is just native human instinct? No. No, I do not. This only speaks to the mindsets of those who tell the stories. Those who’ve had power. And do I think they’re closer to cavemen and thus force upon as all this oversimplified, way-too-violent, brutish cultural explanations that leave our conversations and our dreams wanting.

Beneath and Behind and All Around those yelling their stories as if they’re final are the wise. The quiet. The observers. The humble humans aware of their historical embeddedness. Those who can resist (or who may not even experience) primal impulses of violence. Those who see these impulses as destructive and unsustainable. Those who’d rather wait and see, those who can know one thing while understanding that’s not everything, and not colonize the cultural conversation with my limited knowledge masquerading as fact. Those with honor in their gaze, humility in their hearts, wisdom in their minds, and a reverence in their being, whether conscious or not.

These are the people serving the loud. These are the moms, daughters, sisters, friends, servers, servants, of those delusioned to think they do everything on their own. These are the mature, the evolved. These are the fittest, and they always have been.

Darwin never said it’s a dog eat dog world. There only a sliver of his entire Origin of Species that mentions “survival of the fittest” and it means something entirely different there than it does in our common culture. If the wise had the pen and the audacity to broadcast their opinion to the globe, then perhaps the interpretation would be different. Perhaps it wouldn’t be the fittest who survive. Perhaps it would just be those most loved.

Fitness is a male illusion of independence. Who cooked Adam Smith’s dinner?

Every human you see if a result of generation after generation of accumulated love. Of a network of people around one person who made their survival possible. Independence is a delusion. If you read that and find it delusional, then i feel so sorry for you. That means your memories of your life and your current environment is bare. In reality, you’re surrounded by beautiful souls, full humans just as complex as you whom you deny any internality. You see these humans as just part of your environment. Your life is dead.

It will be painful at first to admit there is even a possibility you don’t know everything. To me, this is a good metric of maturity. Anyone who declares their knowledge complete and true is like a tree cut from it’s roots: dying in real time. Decaying. Perhaps you get eaten from the inside out, like an oak with termites. Or perhaps your foundation is so weak that one wind comes and sends you toppling. Fungus may come and cover your entire body and deter any other life from forming around you. Right now, I’m striking you with lightning, and if you can’t handle it, you will fall.

You’ll get ego withdrawals. You’ll get angry and tremors and sad and foggy and confused. You will be unmoored. But then your roots will begin to grow again and you’ll see you’re not alone. You will see you’ve never been alone. You are the result of inter generational care and kindness. You are the most loved. Bless you. Bless them. Bless us all.

The Right to Bear All

Six-year-old Luis burst out of Tisdale School and ran blindly into oncoming traffic.  A fourth-grader grabbed his arm and pulled Luis to the sidewalk. This is not the first time something like this has happened.

Luis has Autism.  By Connecticut State Law, the Bridgeport Public School district must provide Luis with Individualized Education Plan (IEP), along with trained professionals who can implement it. (1) The city has been in violation of these regulations since 2013 when these new guidelines were passed. Luis is no exception.

His IEP required a maximum of six students in his classroom; he had nine. His IEP required assistive educational technology; he had none. His IEP required a highly structured environment; he was able to run out of the school into a busy avenue. His IEP required assistance with the toilet; he came home in soiled diapers. His mother made repeat complaints to the teachers, school and district. She demanded meetings and action. She was denied.


~~~

Luis(2) is one of many students in Bridgeport Public Schools plagued by bureaucratic stagnation and painful indifference of those responsible. The asymmetry in education between districts is profound. In 2013, Darien Public Schools were also found to be in violation of state special education regulations. Within the year, the special education coordinator for the town resigned and an action plan made. The state later commended the town for these corrective measures.  Even, the Wall Street Journal reported on the town’s failures(3). Although future allegations of noncompliance would be made, media attention and legal resources keep the schools accountable and the students protected in a way unfathomable for families like Luis’s. (4)

~~~

This is not another rant about educational inequality in America.  Those rants go nowhere because they attack surfeit issues rather than their deeper, more insidious roots. We should all have comparable educated not on the basis of some abstract ideals of equality, but on rights concretized in our Constitution. This is not a rant. This is a call to arms about our right to bear arms.  

The second Amendment Reads, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”  This Amendment often gets distorted and funneled into conversations around “gun control”. While gun control is under the Second Amendment’s domain and these conversations need to be had, “gun control” does not even begin to capture the true scope of the Second Amendment.  The entire debate distracts us from the reality: as we scream across the aisle at one another, federal and local governments creep deep into the infrastructure of our lives and rape us of our right “to keep and bear Arms.”

In Federalist No. 46, Founding Father James Madison explains that:

To [the United States Army] would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence.(5)

James Madison writes in 1788, an era still reeling from King George’s tyranny of revolution’s reality.  Madison witnessed a citizenry able to unite successfully against despotism. The “arms” these citizens used to gain independence (cannons, muskets, horses) may seem foreign to our modern minds, but damn oh damn how familiar to our timeless hearts is that desire for freedom.

Madison makes clear that the Second Amendment aims to protect this freedom and our right to defend it. When government institutions vowed to protect us become the threat themselves, the Second Amendment saves us. Madison saw the passion and power of the people insurmountable to any federal force. He writes:

It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. Those who are best acquainted with the last successful resistance of this country against the British arms, will be most inclined to deny the possibility of it.

Look at what we did to the Brits, Madison says. Just try to trample on our freedom. Just try. Bring. It. On.

~~~

In 2018, some things are different. Boys walk into schools with AK47s to kill children. Neighborhood watchers shoot kids wearing hoodies. Judges and juries acquit cops of murder. Paradoxically, American media and politics fixates on two major threats:

1. The immediate threat of gun violence from fellow citizens

2. The completely abstract and distant threat of cyber security

The first point focuses on our ability to physically protect ourselves against proximate threats, while the second demonstrates that those threats and methods of protection are trivial and archaic compared to the unfathomably massive issue of digital destruction. Our conversations center around the shiny, shiny guns, while so many of us are left defenseless. What good is a rifle against a nuclear warhead?  What can a pistol do against a national security hack? The relevant conversation is beyond physical threat. Guns act as adult pacifiers to soothe our fear for the much more real threat to our information.  

Modern injustices are faceless, distant, less obvious than during Madison’s days of tar and feathering.  Especially in our technologically-advanced and information-centric era, the government's greatest weapon of suppression is ignorance, and thus our best protection against tyranny is education. We have a constitutional right to know things like our constitutional rights, so we can wield them when necessary. Poor education leaves citizens defenseless. They bear nothing but their crosses, day in, day out, casualties of a war they knew nothing about.


  1. https://www.cga.ct.gov/2012/rrdata/pr/2012REG2012-046A-RC.PDF

  2. The actual name of the student has been changed for privacy purposes. The full court transcript of Luis’s story can be found here: http://cca-ct.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Bridgeport-Special-Education-Failures-August-2015.pdf

  3. https://www.wsj.com/articles/darien-schools-faulted-on-special-education-1380327014

  4. http://www.mayalaw.com/2016/08/19/darien-specieal-education-idea-violations/

  5. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_No._46


F=AQ Page

FAQ Page

Why was Newton such a big deal?


He found out that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction and distilled his discoveries into his three laws:

  1. Inertia

  2. F=ma

  3. F = -F


Why was Einstein such a big deal?


Well, he kind of took a respectful dump on Newton.


And?


And then quantum physics. Now (or, I guess, always, but we only just now do we “know”), anything is possible at any given moment. BUT only the most probable thing happens.  




Comments:



goddamn free thinking liberal elite need comin up here policin the facts. the apple cant just fall from the goddam tree anymore.  nnooo, einstein and his cronies had to go and ruin the good old days of Newtonian simplicity

Rangler1492



yes!!!!!! nd don’t even get me started on galileo!!!!!! #makemyplanetapancakeagain

Fthe14th









Blog Entry: Curious Cat 1/0

Science- the art of undoing

Merrian Emmster, 3:38 September 26,2018



Scientists, creationists and Vonnegut Fans can all agree that there does exist one big mess, though they all differ on what to do about it. Creationists accept the mess and see our ability to perceive it either as entitlement to conquer it or responsibility to steward it. Artists wonder and then render, not to replace but refract.  Scientists are artists with numbers as their medium. Their pencils and calculators work to pick apart the mess and then recreate it in a different form. “Order” to “chaos”, “chaos” to “order”.

In some ways, science abstracts us from the mess and consequently extracts us from our brutish history with it.  Science helps soothe the modern man’s insecurities. No matter where he ends up, at least he’s cro magnon. He’s no brute. He’s no longer chained to the concrete world of rocks, fire, rape.  No, he has language, reason, hand-sanitizer; he can organize his existence.


The progress of modern physics evidences to us that we as a species have evolved. (We revolve around a sun! We can send rockets to the moon! Look at this lamb I GREW!). Yes, we so smart now. Old us? Them? They no smart. They churn butter. But we! We smart. Our butter from test tubes so good that we still can’t believe it’s. Not. Even. Butter.  Not to be the reason police, but can someone show me the data that proves butter making is a reliable metric of intelligence?





FAQ Page


Why was Newton such a big deal?


He wrote three poems to help modern westerners understand the ancient Hindu and Buddhist concept of karma.  They are below, with rough translation from fifteenth century physics to modern parlance.


Newton’s First Poem: Inertia

    1. Don’t be shocked if things keep doing what they’re doing.


Newton’s Second Law: Conservation of Energy: F=ma

    1. Nothing come from nothing, and nothing goes to nothing.  


Newton’s Third Law: F = -F

    1. What goes around comes around. Live with it.


Newton produced his work when the Scientific Methodists were really only a generation or so old.  It would still be a couple more generations until they integrated into a race of their own. Because Science was still in its gestation period, the only poems available addressing the mess of the universe were things like Christianity and love, and these were (and remain) indecipherable to the new generation, who only speak their native tongue of reason.  Newton’s poems were one of the first widely distributed works translated for this population, and thus they remain a timeless piece of art.


Why was Einstein such a big deal?


Einstein was revolutionary a visual artist whose preferred medium was light.  Thus, his works added a new dimension to Newton’s written works. Out of pure thought crystal, he sculpted a model of the crystal lens we are all born with.  The piece itself weighs nothing, and behaves both like a wave and a particle. It’s an interactive exhibit. Viewers place the crystal next to a thought of theirs and witness its rainbow on the other side. Einstein’s most famous for using his crystal on Newton’s poems.  The world was shocked to witness all the different interpretations of the poems that had been inaccessible until then.


And?


People continue to use Einstein’s crystal to see the world and create their own work. One artist based in Bridgeport, Connecticut is attempting to apply the crystal to modern science and explore its human applications. She noticed science refracts a spectrum of mythology, history and love. She extends the crystal to you. You are not alone, homo sapein.



~~~



It’s so easy to believe that time is linear and that we as a species are more sophisticated now than we’ve ever been. In your pocket you have access to anyone, anywhere, anything, but but but but

We’re just rediscovering exactly that which our ancient ancestors did.  All we did was document it better and live through it. We look back on ancient mythology with the audacity and ego to say “hahhaha! Look at those imbeciles! How naive! They actually believed in a God of cereal!” But maybe—could it be?— that we are the ignorant ones? That we are the simple minded beings instinctively reacting and impulsively believing that all that we found out about these ancient cultures is all there is to know? That not only were our mere human ancestors so much more clever than the natural world so as to produce artifacts that can withstand all time, but that our mere human hands are adequate for unearthing all there is that remains?  





Religious but not Spiritual

Let’s talk about God.

Buy ten NPR totes and get a “spiritual but not religious” pin free. I had one myself. With each passing day at my liberal arts university, I grew prouder of it.  I also became completely disconnected to its meaning. Only after I resurfaced to the real world did I realize why: it is a lie.

The largest leap of faith in human history occurred when we shifted from believing in God to believing in Science. The former assumes the existence of an all-knowing being, whereas the latter rests on two fundamental assumptions:

  1. It is possible to know all.

  2. I can know all.

We scaffolded science onto religious faith, and then we made a crucial quantum jump.  We still believe in an “all-knowing being”, but now we know who it is: us.

And so began construction of our Ivory Tower of Babel.  Communicative chaos has ensued. E=mc^2, we now say. Game Theory, we say. Quinoa, we say. A choir of voices from inside and outside the Intelligentsia sing praises of intellectualism. We relegated God from transcendental to intellectual, and now our deep uncertainty and vulnerability cowers beneath an illusion of scientific order. Facts barricade the truth, and words damn true understanding. Our intellectual idols wield swords forged from hollow words, which protect them from nothing but their own humanity.  Intellectuals become so untouchably smart, so spiritually isolated, so adamantly non-religious, and so often deeply unhappy.

    And wouldn’t you feel this way, too, if you’ve devoted your life to a God of facts that proves to be false? To cope with the spiritual trauma, we jump on a treadmill of intellectual hedonism.  Unlike other hedonistic pleasures such as gambling, sex or drugs, we venerate white-collar addictions such as workaholism, financial success, and beauty, but the two fulfill the exact same role.  Enlightenment, our intellectual opiate, beckons us, and we ravenously run towards it. This pursuit of fleeting pleasures exhausts us, yet we are too tired or too busy or too afraid to sit in the seat of our souls and rest.  Depression trickles down from the Ivory Tower, and, fervently, tragically, we try to cure ourselves using the very methodology that poisons us. Yet what is this insistence on facts but faith?  What is this dogged loyalty to science but a religion?  No, no-- our data driven culture is not at all spiritual, but it is unequivocally religious.

“Knowledge” has replaced knowing.  Facts have replaced feeling.  The “enlightenment” we fixate on is a mere projection and our pursuit thereof a stationary sprint.  True “enlightenment” comes from stepping off the treadmill, shrugging off the burden of almighty pursuit, and awakening to God who has been all around us, always.   Let’s stop running and sit in the sacred. Let’s bask in our laughable ignorance and baptise ourselves in our infinite wisdom. Let’s talk about God. In recognizing our own humanity, we will reveal the divinity, indivisibly, in us all.   

Human(e)

Words slice reality into bite size chunks. Otherwise, this shit would be a mouthful.  Words are how we distinguish between a chair and a dog and where the sidewalk ends. For day to day life, words are accurate and hyper-efficient. Our smart brains serve us words like line cooks at a fast food joint. Unconscious, automatic, mechanical.

We’re addicted to our fast food. We our words up. We love them. Words are what makes us special. Human, as opposed to the grunting Neanderthal and inarticulate nematode. We largely live by and with and for words. Our Founding Document protects our God-Given right to words unlimited (First Amendment) and our right to hoard our words as we see fit (Miranda Rights). With just two words, we marry people (“I do.”)! We spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on tuition for some words (“PhD”). When it comes to the human scale, words are the perfect size. But for anything the size of humanity, words have proven near disastrous.

Words help us survive, but they are not life itself. Sometimes they mislead us. We’re human. Words come quick; we can’t control their arrival. We cannot be blamed for language’s automaticity and consequent shortcomings. We can be blamed, however, if we take our automatic labels to be unquestionable truth. If we allow our short-order brain to rule, we’re not just being inhumane; we’re not being human.  

Quite often lately, I hear people throw the word “inhumane” around as an insult, but rarely have I seen someone meet this accusation with heartbreak. Most people brush it off and go back to feeling themselves. Who cares about being humane when you can be rich? Powerful? Beautiful? Known?

But being inhumane is just one letter away— just a single vocal stressor away— from being inhuman, and that (at least to me) seems like a deep insult. We  identify too heavily with our ability to produce words. We preserved it, though, in the name we gave unto ourselves: to be human is to be humane.

If automatic labels are fast food, then acts of humanity are slow cooked meals. We think our words make us smart because they imply consciousness. In fact, the ability to override our impulsive labels and to sit in non-judgement takes even more brain power.  To be humane is to be aware. To be humane is to be conscious. To be human is to be alive. It is not just a moral quirk given to the angels amongst us. It is not just a random act of measured generosity. It’s a genetic responsibility. It’s a categorical imperative. It’s a definition.




Uncanny Valley

“As the appearance of a robot is made more human, some observer’s emotional response to the robot becomes increasingly positive and empathetic until it reaches a point beyond which the response quickly becomes strong revulsion. However, as the robot’s appearance continues to become less distinguishable from a human being, the emotional response becomes positive once again and approaches human-to-human empathy levels”



    Roboticist Masahiro Mori coined the term “UnCanny Valley” to describe the creepiness of robots.  We humans tend to like robots more the more they resemble humans— until a certain point. Specifically, at 81% human-resemblance, our liking plummets into strong rejection.

We’ve all experienced this precipitous drop into the Uncanny Valley. Baby dolls are cute; silicone babies are creepy. Cartoons are cute; bad drawings are… bad.  Halle Berry is sexy; Wax Halle Berry is only kind of sexy. Those imposters can STAY in their creepy valley where they belong!

Until about 99%. Then, we start to like the darn thing again. The 99-percenters can trick us into forgetting they’re robots, and we ex-machina all over them.  

   

The Uncanny Valley demonstrates many things, two of which I’d like to highlight here:


  1. Reality is non-linear

  2. The more conscious effort we put into manufacturing ourselves, the creepier we get.


To the second point:


    The easiest example is “the natural look.”  Walk into your local Walgreens. You will be greeted by row after row of beautify products promising the “Beach Tousle”, the “Sun-kissed glow”, the “Shades of Nude.”  Each of these products strongly recommends another product, or ten. At eighty six cents to the dollar, this can get costly. This face wash dries her skin, so she needs this lotion, and that lotion makes her face shiny, so she needs this power, but this powder makes her face smell like a baby’s ass, so she needs this perfume to attract mates with her pheromones and shit.  Nowadays, a woman pays a tit and a labe to appear as if she never paid nor tried nor gave any of her shits to make the world wonder: “Maybe she’s born with it; maybe it’s Maybelline.”

    Another example:  Greenwich Lawns. Drive through the lush hills of the Gold Coast on a Sunday morning and you will see the source of those perfectly manicured hedges: immigrant labor. (Specifically, Latino men, as the women are busy caring for the children.) You can appreciate the aesthetic balance of the estate, but it does not viscerally arrest you in the way a waterfall or tiger lily or rainbow would.  The succulent, majestic, meaty beauty vanished and left behind a creepy, wonderless shell. 1


1. Please feel free to skip this footnote, especially if you have a tendency toward the literal.

Here are a list of other things in the Uncanny Valley:

    Botox, Psychopaths, Amendments 1-27, margarine, the seventies, the FDA food pyramid, “Reconstruction”, aerosol, the Cold War, The Tower of Babel, the Twin Paradox, Newtonian Physics. Freud


Let’s play a game called, “Yeah, that’s creepy.”  Look at the room around you. There is a collection of things and furniture that ended up there some way or another.  Now imagine that someone had consciously put each and every thing there to seduce you into comfort. Now what was an organic environment becomes a test tube.  Your peaceful solitude mutated into a simulation under the watch of an unknown eye. Now, you say, “yeah, that’s creepy.”

We can isolate some variables of beauty: symmetry, color theory, balance. But we’re poetically unconscious of that which draws us to it: the juicy connective tissue between natural beauty’s bare bones that, like God, transcends our conscious but not our perception. God communicates to us through angels, through prophets, through miracles. God presses its hand against one side of the warm walls of reality’s womb, and we press ours against the other. But we never touch directly, and that is beautiful in and of itself. So too do we experience beauty.. Beauty is not a thing to pick up and pick apart. Beauty happens.  It happens beyond, within, and through us but never by us.

But, damn, do we try.


With epic regularity, humans strut up to history and declare it conquered. Time and time again history engulfs us back into its beautiful, beastly, belly. Remarkable how we never fail to believe that this time— that we— will be different.

I’ve never been one to believe a thing impossible, except for this: we will never escape ourselves. We try, and in so doing become less human.  We build ourselves up on top of fleeting pleasures and flimsy smiles, and we fall. We fall. We fall.

Into the Uncanny Valley.

No sign of life.

Devil’s Food Cake

People salivate for Descartes.  Every introductory philosophy course incorporates his Meditations*.  Pseudo-intellectuals quote his “I think; therefore, I am;” (some douchebags even regurgitate the Latin “Cognito ergo sum.”)** We like this. It sounds good. It makes us feel comfy in ourselves, and this is especially important if you venerate reason over god.  You need something to validate your existence.

We like Descartes for all his intellectual food for thought, but we love him for his being a human.  One of us.  A human said that— damn, we’re smart! It’s a sort of patriotism of species.  It’s quite easy (and, therefore, common) to gobble up his glory and eat around the actual substance to his claim. We serve up knowledge of Descartes’s knowledge (or any intellectual concept) to feed our vanity. We devour it.  When others devour it, too, this feedback feeds us, and it goes straight to our egos.


~~~


I’m proud to say I’ve never murdered anyone.  I’ve also never committed adulatory. I’ve never been married, so I’ve never really had the chance to, but I’m pretty sure if I ever was married, I wouldn’t. I have stolen, but nothing, like, serious, and I’ve repented for that, kind of.  


Other than that, I’ve completely shattered the other tablet.


In case you forgot, like I did, here are the first six commandments:


  1. I am the LORD thy God.

  2. No other gods before me.

  3. No graven images or likenesses.

  4. Not take the LORD's name in vain.

  5. Remember the sabbath day.

  6. Honour thy father and thy mother.


    (While I don’t consciously believe in the LORD, as a rational being it is my duty to weigh the evidence and counter evidence to every possibility.)  


Upon reflection, I feel kind of like a brute for only remembering the last four commandments.  Those are kind of the easiest to avoid as long as you’ve evolved past caveman and have a vivid enough imagination to realize what a mess it would be if you ever decapitated someone and/or coveted their neighbor's donkey.  These sins, though, are just collateral to the most fundamental vice: idolatry.


~~~


False idols are delicious. Alexander the Great. Einstein the Genius.  Theresa the Saint **. The Fancy Degree. The Corner Office. The Tight Body. Brand names, brand posts, brand lives.  Yum, yum, yum, brand me, baby.


~~~


One pre-teen day, before the alchemy of adolescence hijacked the Puritan in me, I was exploring the edges of gravity alone in my bedroom; specifically, I was experimenting with how far off the edge of my chair I could scoot my butt before I fell off. Just, you know, being a scientist, in the way kids are. Then, eureka! I fell. “God damn it!” I exclaimed, trying out the tongue of a sinner. Immediately, I imploded with remorse. I ran to the bathroom and washed my own mouth with Irish Spring. It was awful.


~~~


Vanity is defined as, “excessive pride in one's appearance, qualities, abilities, achievements, etc.” and in vain is defined as “without effect or avail; to no purpose.”  Is “God damn it!” in vain if you mean it as an earnest request?  

    Or is profanity essentially due to vanity? To use the Lord’s name “in vain” is to use it for empty reasons that strip it of its divine nutrients, to process the Patris, to flash fry the Filii, to sugarcoat the Spiritus Sancti.

~~~


Our hyper speed lives force us to eat ego on the go, and like fast food, this leaves many of us malnourished.  We scavenge for substance to make us finally feel full. We eat so much, we forget to taste. We hear so much, we forget to listen.  We think so much, we forget to be. Sugary shots of vanity— of affluence and accolade— cause spikes and drops in our soul insulin; we can no longer regulate our inner selves. We are spiritually diabetic, and we are addicted to the devil’s food cake.

DOW Jonestown

Commodity

  1. an economic good: such as

    1. a product of agriculture like grain and corn

    2. an article of commerce especially when delivered for shipment

    3. a mass-produced unspecialized product

  2. something useful or valued (see: thing, entity, convenience, advantage)

  3. a good or service whose wide availability typically leads to smaller profit margins and diminishes the importance of factors (such as brand name) other than price

  4. obsolete : quantity, lot



           ~~~



Soft commodities include but are not limited to: wheat, rice, barley. Hard commodities include but are not limited to: iron, ivory, diamond. Energy commodities include but are not limited to: coal, gas, sunlight. Linguistic commodities include and are limited to: words.



~~~


How I see the universe:


Atoms. A whole bunch of ‘em. Everywhere, a lot, and in some places, even more. Sometimes atoms pack so tightly, they end up bonding. Like how we humans do.  Hm— I guess I think of atoms as small humans. (Wasn’t that the name of the first one of us?)


~~~


Atoms buy and exchange themselves in the market of matter. That’s what friction is: a molecular transaction between surfaces. That’s what water does: H20 investing in your oats, your iron, your cells. That’s what electronics have: atomic particles trickling down a circuit. Of course, we don’t see this.  We see rubber. We see Vaseline. We see breakfast, rust, iPhones. We see the human-scaled phenomena, and we group them into clumps convenient to trade in the market of human interaction.


So even though we know about all those atoms, we don’t talk about them as individuals. It wouldn’t make any sense in daily life. And besides, atoms don’t mind us grouping them all together. In fact, hey seem to like it. For example, if I asked you, “Yo, reader, pass me that Twizzler,” you’re not going to hand it to me one atom at a time. I’d kill you— after we both died of old age. You’d hand me a whole Twizzler all at once, all in one piece, because when those Twizzler atoms hear my request, they cheer “Yippee!” and join arms and ease on down the road to my digestive tract. I have to masticate to get those mother lovers to separate. It’s a fair trade: we get to eat Twizzlers, and atoms get to stick with their friends. Net GAIN.


Or wait— is it a paper gain?

(paper gain- unrealized capital gain/loss in an investment. For a purchased long investment, it is the difference between the current price and the purchase price. For a sold or short investment, it is the difference between the price when sold short and the current price.)


I’m not sure atoms are getting a return on their investment. After all, our linguistic commodities (i.e. the unified concept of “Twizzler” or clumping my atoms together as a unit of “Emma”) have no value on any scale other than human.  They matter next to nothing for the atom or the planet. In the economy of the universe, words have no market power. Words can point towards meaning, but they themselves have no inherent value. 1



~~~


Before the enlightenment, the printing press, the telephone, the record player—before—words were rare. -Er. RarER. Linguistic opportunities were limited to the local. Hand-crafted, small batch, artisanal words. Bought at a farmers market. Slow-cooked letters.  Fine wine lyrics. Elite literacy. 2. Now, we buy and sell and exchange words at unprecedented rates. We trade words before its meaning— its value— can catch up. We’ve saturated the market. Soon our linguistic bubble will burst and our Babel economy will collapse. 3




  1. The author can not comment directly on the atomic market of matter, for she herself is human and can speak only to the human market of chatter. However, a reputable source, who prefers to remain anonymous, reports, “we’re fine.”

  2. The author does not intend to portray a nostalgia for the past. Look at her: she’s typing and erasing and copying and pasting at ADHD rates as she sips a soy milk latte and listens to Rihanna. She loves modern day. She intends only to emphasis that, back in the day, words were reverse endangered.

  3. The author writes and rewrites the last sentence four times. She hears ambient music (with lyrics), and she ignores. She hears people she has never talked to and will never talk to talk around her, and she ignores. She sports a shirt that says “Don’t worry. Be Yonce” but did not realize she had put on a garment with a message when she threw it on this morning. She’s literally (literally!) sitting on a newspaper she stole just for the Sudoku.  Words shmurds. But she reads this: “Ponzi scheme (noun)- a form of fraud in which belief in the success of a nonexistent enterprise is fostered by the payment of quick returns to the first investors from money invested by later investors,” and she doesn’t know who Ponzi was or who the schemer would be, but, nevertheless, she wonders...